2
Appreciation post for using a test cut before the real job... but is it always needed?
I keep seeing guys on here argue that you should always run a test cut with scrap material before you start the real part. And I get it, especially for new material or tight tolerances. But last Tuesday I had a batch of 50 aluminum parts that were all the same, and I wasted 20 minutes setting up a test piece when I already knew my feeds and speeds from the last run. On the other hand, I also had a job two months ago where I skipped the test cut on some mystery plate and ended up with a 0.015 inch oversize hole that ruined the whole piece. So what do you all think? Is the test cut a must-do every single time, or is it fine to skip it when you've already dialed in the same setup before?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
joelp8128d ago
mystery plate" from juliahall - yeah that's exactly what it was, some random piece I grabbed from the drop pile. But here's the thing that bugs me a little when people say you should always test cut. It's not really about the plate being unknown. It's about whether you changed anything in your setup. Like, if you're running the same material, same tool, same speeds, same everything from a job you just did, testing again is just burning time and material. I bet a lot of the guys who swear by always testing are just repeating what they heard without thinking about it. The real trick is knowing when you actually need that test cut, and that comes from paying attention to what changed between jobs. If you can't remember what you ran last time, sure, test it. But if you literally have the notes from three hours ago, run it.
8
juliahall28d ago
Skipping the test cut is a gamble... and that mystery plate won the bet against you.
7